|
* * * * * * * * Mr and Mrs Russell’s ‘Harmony and Expression of Motion,’ 1886
Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, London, Saturday, 31 July 1886 * * * * * * * *
Without Love, a drama by Edmund Yates and A.W. Dubourg
‘Under the touch of Mr. Alfred Thompson’s wand, aided by the chink of Miss [Ada] Cavendish’s money-bags, the dingy old Olympic has been transformed into the most gorgeous little theatre in London. It is unfortunate that one ruling power was absent from the ceremony - namely, taste. Gold and colours have been lavished in the internal decorations until the eye become dazed and the head turns giddy; and, in consequence, when the curtain rises the most sumptuous costumes appear poor and homely, whilst the scenery, though new and good, looks shabby and commonplace. Mr. Thompson would have done well to have studied certain articles which appeared some time since in the Athenaeuum upon "stage decoration," wherein it was clearly demonstrated that all glorification of the auditorium was at the expense of the stage, and hence of the treasury; that colours and patterns should therefore be kept down, and made to enhance by neutral tones the dresses and complexions of the fairer portion of the audience, whose charms might be considered as more pleasing to the eye than any amount of upholstery and stencilling. The hues of the renovated house are green, blue, and violet, exquisitely harmonised, all diapered with arabesque ornament belonging to the Greek, Italian, Renaissance, and Japanese styles, jumped together in a bewildering omnium gatherum, from amidst which medley rise groups of pale faces and colourless dresses, like mushrooms out of a flower-bed. The background of the boxes being light, throws out their occupants in shadow against a pale surface - an arrangement by no means happy. This is the second theatre that has been transformed under Mr. Thompson’s eye, with no greater success as regards good taste than the former one. One the other hand, Miss Cavendish not only abolishes fees, but puts the fragrant programme conceit to flight, so that we can study our playbill without being turned faint by the sickly odours which by courtesy are termed "scent." This is a most agreeable reform. After the performance of an inane farce, the curtain rose upon the new drama of which we have all heard so much, and from which great things were expected. Now, I have passed much of my youth in Continental capitals, have sown granaries of wild oats, have perpetrated al the endless little wickednesses which we consider necessary to a proper appreciation of that vague thing, "life," and in fact have revelled in everything which appeared to my unfledged mind "delightfully disreputable;" but never, in my wildest dreams, did I imagine anything so revoltingly wicked as the ordinary thoughts and impulses of the characters in this singular play. With no exception their desires and aspirations are of the grossest, without redeeming points; therefore the piece, though undeniably clever (and dramatic in the third act), is like a dose of physic, leaving an unpleasant flavour in the mouth.’ * * * * * * * *
Dion Boucicault’s drama, The Octoroon; or, Life in Louisiana
‘Sir, - Now-a-days faults, either in the construction or acting of new plays, or in the acting of revived ones, rarely fail to be detected by the microscope of criticism; but I think a drama can be pointed out which enjoyed a fair London "run," and favourable criticism at its production, part of the plot of which is not only improbable (which is all "sensation" demands), but impossible, and which I do not think has ever been publicly noticed (except by myself, in an Edinburgh newspaper). I allude to that twin to the Colleen Bawn [by Dion Boucicault], the Octoroon, and it is Salem Scudder’s Photography [in the latter] which is at fault. In that play Photography was for the first time, I think, made to play a prominent part in a dramatic plot - an accidentally taken picture giving evidence against a murderer. But in what an impossible and impracticable way is this supposed to be brought about! An unprepared plate is exposed in a camera, behind an unfocused lens, a murder is enacted before it (in which the figures of course moved) and the apparatus is immediately afterwards smashed by a tomahawk blow. A considerable time afterwards, upon examination of the broken instrument, it is found to contain a life-like picture of the murderer stooping over his victim; and that without the plate having been developed, or in any way manipulated with. Indeed, such an excellent likeness is it that the prisoner (McLoskey) is immediately convicted upon its evidence, Salem Scudder observing that "The apparatus can’t lie." * * * * * * Frank Ottoway, a stage Ethiopian, 1887
Hammersmith Theatre of Varieties
|
© John Culme, 2002